| Theology Q&ABy Dr. J. Rodman WilliamsTheologian
 
 Dr. J. Rodman Williams answers theological questions, exclusively on CBN.com.         More 
        from Dr. J. Rodman Williams  
 2. Scripture, Knowledge of God, Faith
 
 
     My wife passed away from cancer and yet people prayed for her healing 
		  from when she was diagnosed until she breathed her last. She was in her 
		  early 40's, loved the Lord with all her heart, read the Bible daily, prayed 
		  for others and believed in divine healing. She stood on the word and believed 
		  her healing was coming and would be a testament to the power of God. Jesus 
		  has many stories of how God wants the best for us and that through faith 
		  all things are possible. Why are some healed and some not?
 "For me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain." These words 
		  of Paul in Philippians 1:21 ring in my heart and mind as applying to your 
		  beloved wife. For hers was a Christ-like faith despite her long illness. 
		  For to her "to live was Christ," and though you doubtless grieve 
		  over her death, the second words surely apply…"to die is gain"---gain 
		  from the recurring sickness but positively that death meant ushering her 
		  in to heaven's joy and peace, being with Christ forever. So in the midst 
		  of your sorrow, you may rejoice with her. Praise the Lord! Back | Top   Is there such a doctrine called "Sola Scriptura" -- that the Bible is 
		  the sole/final authority of divine revelation? If so, could you show where 
		  in Scripture does it literally state that "the Bible is the sole/final 
		  authority of revelation?"
 "All Scripture is inspired by God" (2 Timothy 3:16) -- literally "God-breathed" 
		  (as the NIV translates it). Sola Scriptura stems from the conviction that 
		  Scripture alone--not tradition, human experience, or anything else -- 
		  can occupy this singular position. Back | Top   Which version of the Bible is most accurate and true to the original documents? 
		  Is it true that the modern versions of Scripture, such as NIV and NASB, 
		  are leaving out important words and phrases that diminish the deity and 
		  Lordship of Christ?
 I find both NIV (New International Version) and NASB (New American Standard 
		  Bible) to be helpful modern translations. The NASB is the more literal 
		  of the two, but the NIV is easier to read. Neither of these translations 
		  in any way diminishes the deity and Lordship of Christ. Back | Top   I've been reading your answers to the predestination questions, but I'm 
		  still having a hard time with God "hardening" Pharaoh's heart when Moses 
		  went to Pharaoh again and again to ask for freedom. Obviously it allowed 
		  for many miracles to be seen, but was that the only reason for hardening 
		  his heart?
 Although Scripture says several times that God hardened Pharaoh's heart, 
		  it also states that Pharaoh hardened his own heart (see Exodus, chapters 
		  7-9). Perhaps you have heard the saying, "The same sun that hardens clay 
		  melts wax." Ponder this in relation to the hardening of Pharaoh's heart. Back | Top   I have heard many theologians quickly dismiss the dictation theory of 
		  inspiration. Is it possible that this theory is correct?
 A dictation theory of inspiration assumes that every word of Scripture 
		  was given directly by God. The human writer was no more than a secretary 
		  who transcribed the words given. This is far too mechanical a view of 
		  inspiration. Dictation would imply no human element. To be sure, dictation 
		  would apply in many places (for example, the Ten Commandments), but almost 
		  everywhere the biblical record gives evidence of unerring human input. 
		  This may be called a dynamic view of inspiration. Back | Top   I noticed your article on your web site defending Scripture as being inspired. 
		  I noticed that in your discussion of "all Scripture" you did not address 
		  extra-biblical writings. I consider the Asian cultures who have been fed 
		  from their scriptures for thousands of years and view what we consider 
		  Scripture through their lens. To not acknowledge that their scriptures 
		  contain truth closes communication. I would be thankful for any response.
 My "all Scripture" discussion deliberately did not address extra-biblical 
		  writings whatever their merit. I do not believe them to be on the same 
		  level of inspiration. All Scripture, Paul says, is "inspired [God-breathed]" 
		  (2 Timothy 3:16) and therefore occupies a unique place of authority. This 
		  does not eliminate the value of many other religious writings of the world. 
		  They may well point the way to biblical truth. Back | Top   How should I respond from a Bible perspective to a friend 
		  who believes that all truth is relative?
 A simple but profound answer is what Jesus said: "I am the way, and the 
		  truth, and the life" (John 14:6). Not "a way." Not "a truth." Not "a life." 
		  There is nothing relative about the truth in Christ. Back | Top   How do we convince people that Scriptures are genuine accounts 
		  and not, as some assert, merely stories?
 One answer to this question lies in archeological findings that increasingly 
		  confirm the accuracy of scriptural data. Many names and places in the 
		  Bible that for a long time were viewed by some as non-existent (Sodom 
		  and Gomorrah, for example) have been discovered. Further, a noted archeologist, 
		  Nelson Glueck, writes: "It can be stated categorically that no archeological 
		  discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference." The Bible 
		  contains genuine historical accounts throughout. Back | Top     I have often heard the statement that the Bible is "verbally 
    inspired." What does that mean?
 Verbal inspiration is the term frequently employed to attest that each 
		  individual part of the Bible is God's word. The Holy Spirit superintended 
		  the writing of Scripture down to the last details. Paul speaks of imparting 
		  truth "not in words taught by human wisdom, but those taught by the 
		  Spirit" (1 Corinthians 2:13). Thus the Scriptures while written by 
		  men and in human words are God's word in writing. They are verbally inspired.(For more on this, see my paper entitled "Scripture: 
		    God's Written Word" here on CBN.com).
 Back | Top     How can I prove to non-believers that God exists?
 One cannot prove this. Rather "he who comes to God must believe 
		  that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him" 
		  (Hebrews 11:6). Faith precedes knowledge-the eyes of faith receive what 
		  goes beyond mind and reason. There are evidences of God in nature (see 
		  Romans 1:20) but not so much as to constitute proof. Back | Top   
 What is the meaning and value of so-called "natural 
    theology?
 Natural theology is the effort to build a doctrine concerning the knowledge 
		  of God without appeal to special revelation in the Bible by utilizing 
		  only the data that may be drawn from nature, human existence, history, 
		  etc. Such natural theology may be intended as a substitute for revealed 
		  theology (theology grounded in special revelation) or as providing a kind 
		  of rational base therefor. In either event, the premise of natural theology 
		  is that there is a certain basic and objective knowledge of God that can 
		  be explicated, and that any rational person who is willing to think clearly 
		  will arrive at this truth. Thus natural theology, while admitting limits 
		  in what it can accomplish, claims to have positive value. Especially, 
		  so it is said, is this needed in a world that gives priority to reason 
		  over revelation. In reply, natural theology fails to recognize two basic things. First, 
		  a person's knowledge at best is disproportionate to the knowledge of God: 
		  he may have ideas about God, but they are no more than human constructs 
		  extrapolated into infinity. Hence, man's knowledge capacity is insufficient 
		  to arrive at a full knowledge of God. Second, though there is a general 
		  revelation of God in nature, humanity and history, it is so perverted 
		  through mankind's sinfulness that people's minds are futile and incapable 
		  of discerning what God is disclosing. If people were godly and righteous, 
		  then surely what God discloses through general revelation could affords 
		  a basis for natural theology. But since they have turned from God, they 
		  cannot know God through natural understanding. It should also be added, however, that when God comes to mankind in His 
		  special revelation and a person truly receives it, then his eyes are once 
		  more opened to the knowledge of God in the universe, human existence, 
		  and all of history. It is ultimately only the person who has faith who 
		  can cry out, "The heavens are telling the glory of God." Hence 
		  Christian theology is not based on natural theology but is based on special 
		  revelation, which will include far more than anything that natural theology 
		  could ever attempt. (See Renewal 
		  Theology, 1: page 36.) Back | Top 
 
 CBN IS HERE FOR YOU!Are you seeking answers in life? Are you hurting?
 Are you facing a difficult situation?
  A caring friend will be there to pray with you in your time of need. |